Monthly Archive for October, 2008

Blood on the carpet

Yet more jibbering idiocy over the Jonathan Ross/Russell Brand affair. Lesley Douglas, BBC Radio 2’s Controller, has resigned in the wake of tabloid outrage and hyperbole.

Last night on Newsnight the target of the “joke”, actor Andrew Sachs, said that the matter was pretty much over as the two presenters had apologised. Subsequently Brand has resigned and Ross has been suspended for 3-months by the BBC.

Don’t you just love it? The BBC, as always, has been forced to pull down its trousers and bend over, while the collective tabloid media buggers it silly with its enormous cock of hypocrisy. And yet again our shower of a government has piled in (as did Slippery Dave, but that’s hardly a surprise considering what a predictable populist shitbag he is).

So none of our illustrious leaders thought it wise to caution some measure of restraint in all the hype and chaos? Brown and/or Cameron, both of which were happy to jump on the bandwagon for a few choice quotes, could have risen above the fray and argued for a modicum of common-sense. That, remember, is what leaders are supposed to do.

Brand and Ross are both polemicist comics who push against the line of decency. Occasionally, especially when they’re together - egging each other on and getting carried away, they’ll step over the line.

What they did to Andrew Sachs was out of order. They were offensive while making no cultural or political point. This is where programmes such a South Park differ, they use deeply offensive jokes for real political and social commentary. Ross and Brand were just being twats.

Both Ross and Brand should have been reprimanded and were right to apologise, but the media witch-hunt and the subsequent resignations and suspensions, are nothing more than capitulation as the usual rightwing rags have a pop at the tax-funded BBC (an opportunity they never miss).

In what must be the most baffling example of hypocrisy, Georgina Baillie (Sach’s granddaughter who was at the centre of the scandal) has milked the story for all it’s worth, pleading outrage (after her grandfather had indicated his wish to put the issue to bed) and then discussing her “romps” with Brand with - you guessed it - The Sun.

The whole thing is a crock, and a waste of everyone’s time. It’s shocking that Lesley Douglas has been hounded out of her job because Brand and Ross lost the plot. It’s about time the BBC stood up for itself in the face of ridiculous faux outrage from the rightwing press. If they don’t the jackals will never stop.

Sphere: Related Content

More “Joe the Plumber” BS

The Guardian has news that Sam “Joe the Plumber” Wurzelbacher (who has become a byword for every hard-working American in John McCain’s lexicon) is being courted by a record company, keen to turn him into a country music star.

Jim Della Croce, his PR spokesperson (seriously), has claimed ::

“He is a dynamic speaker and an everyman who has become an overnight celebrity…”

Substitute “everyman” for “Republican plant”, and “overnight celebrity” for “liar”, and he’s just about right.

Sphere: Related Content

We’re lovin’ it

Adjacent to a story about scare-mongering food studies…

… a McDonalds burger ad. I’m lovin’ it.

Sphere: Related Content

Darling: Give us our cheap petrol

Considering Alistair Darling “controls” the greatest proportion of the cost of fuel, he’s got some nerve to be taking these sort of cheap, populist positions.

Where was the tax relief when the oil prices pummelled working families and businesses over the summer?

Everyone has to do their bit, Mr. Chancellor.

Sphere: Related Content

Watchdog not interested in Osborne probe

The BBC is reporting that the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner will not investigate Gideon George Osborne over his dealings with a Russian oligarch.

Following a widely reported series of events that have also landed Peter Mandleson in hot water, the Shadow Chancellor has been fighting for his political life after it was said that he had attempted to solicit a £50,000 donation from billionaire Oleg Deripaska.

Now it seems Osborne will survive. Shame.

Sorry, but is it me or is there something fundamentally smarmy about Osborne? Seriously, I really can’t stand the guy. I don’t want to come across all class-warrior and all that (I’m really not the type), but there is something about him that really gets under my skin. Have you seen the Bullingdon photos?

He reminds me of those people at school who always hung around the big kids and caused trouble.

A paragraph in last week’s Guardian suggests the smug self-importance isn’t just an unfortunate appearance ::

One Osborne tactic which has irritated colleagues is his tendency to send out text messages to junior frontbenchers, often late in the evening, with mildly critical remarks. When the hapless MPs reply they receive no response because Osborne has switched off his phone. The following day he will joke that he meant no harm and that he was sending group texts.

Nice.

Of course truth is that, had Osborne continued to deny the allegations, his old friend Nat Rothschild had enough evidence to “finish” him. It’s pretty clear that Mr. Osborne has been naughty, but the establishment is protecting its own as usual.

Sphere: Related Content

But what if Obama does win?

As the McCain-Palin ticket turns in on itself, the media narrative is building towards an Obama win by some margin.

On Sunday’s Meet the Press, an awkward and mumbling John McCain maintained that the polls do not reflect the reality on the ground. He argued that the American people will put their trust in him as the man best equipped to be President on day-one. Of course the Senator from Arizona knows the trouble he’s in, but for appearances sake, he must play up his chances.

But what if the polls can be trusted?

What if, on January 20 2009, The United States of America really does inaugurate Barack Obama as its first African-American President? What can we actually expect from a progressive executive in these difficult times?

America’s economic situation is as dire as it has been for 80-years. An economy that has been in overdrive since the early nineties, powered by an injection of cheap credit, has finally blown a gasket. Americans are finding that credit has dried up.

Millions of Americans are heavily indebted and are finding mortgage repayments impossible. They’re demanding tax cuts, but the federal budget is also drastically in the red and both candidates have promised to work to address it - even though the purse-strings are very much the preserve of Congress. The collective debt of the U.S., oft reported as in excess of $10-trillion dollars, is, including off-balance sheet liabilities, closer to five times as much.

How can a president who promises a capital-intensive Apollo-like energy project, a balanced budget, a strong foreign policy, tax cuts and better healthcare coverage, possibly deliver?

What America needs, as Michael Kinsley argued last week, is a leader who is committed to “telling people what they don’t want to hear and leading them where they don’t want to go.” If America was really going into the recovery position - and things are surely that bad, it would start by telling its citizens that the good times are suspended until further notice. Indeed neither of the candidates are being honest with the American people.

No-one, not even a president who walks on water, can possibly satisfy the huge expectation that the Obama campaign has cultivated. The opportunity for political disillusionment is colossal.

When January comes around the same problems will persist. The national debt will be gargantuan, the military will be overstretched, and millions of Americans will be struggling to make rent and their families without healthcare coverage. Obama will be limited by the realities of office as to what he can do to remedy these issues, especially considering the dire situation he will inherit from President Bush. So there is little doubt that many thousands of progressive activists will be disappointed by the time it takes to create real change. As usual, the left may become it’s own worst enemy and attack its own.

In fact, the left will probably be piling onto an administration already under siege…

The Republicans have had months to prepare for opposition. The rightwing talk-show hacks are already in 5th gear. They will hit Obama hard on day one (politicos will remember Clinton’s wings were clipped even before his inauguration), in an attempt to paralyse his administration.

America’s progressives, who will have given so much to get Obama elected, must be prepared to continue to support him through the inevitable trials of office.

There is only so much an inspirational president can achieve. I hope American progressives are prepared for a slow, long haul. America, surely, deserves it.

Sphere: Related Content

The irregular quote of the day II

A double quote of the day today. I just couldn’t let this reader comment from The Times slide. It follows an article about how the Madonna/Guy Ritchie makes for boring copy ::

hell, i’m bored stiff by my OWN divorce. other people’s? no thanks. by definition divorce is tedious and depressing - and it features lawyers. spare us.

but i guess there is a powerful element of schadenfreuder (spl?) at play here so i can see why some might find it a satisfying subject. not me though. yawn

Amen.

I couldn’t care less if the divorce is a scandal-ridden mess or a boringly mutual affair. It’s someone else’s divorce. I really don’t give a flying fuck.

All these vapid stories about celebrities really get on my tits. Really. I don’t care about their style choices and cellulite. These people only exist to divert you from real issues or to sell more shoes.

We probably wont see the end of the world, we’ll be too busy reading Heat magazine.

Sphere: Related Content

The irregular quot of the day

Paul Harris writing in The Guardian ::

Now that same Republican party could face a prolonged period in the political wilderness, working out how to appeal to an American public that seems prepared to send a pro-life, black senator from Chicago to the White House and reject a conservative Republican war hero.

Sphere: Related Content

On sleaze

The Guardian has a report on some sleazy, if technically lawful, donations to the Tory party from a Ukrainian Oligarch ::

A British businessman who represents a Ukrainian oligarch is paying tens of thousands of pounds in donations to the Tories, the Guardian can disclose. Payments made by the businessman’s company have caused concern to the Electoral Commission, which queried some of the donations earlier this year.

Pauline Neville-Jones, shadow security minister, former chair of the joint intelligence committee and a key Cameron foreign policy adviser, currently has her office sponsored by Robert Shetler-Jones, a close associate of the foreign billionaire Dmitry Firtash.

A company linked to Shetler-Jones is also making payments to Conservative central office. It is called Scythian Ltd. Shetler-Jones chairs and part owns it…

Just why would a foreign gas-baron, and an all-round scum-bag by all accounts, be funnelling money to the Tories?

What’s in it for him? (Have they no shame?)

Of course all parties are equally guilty. Labour have little reason to be proud. And the Lib Dems? Don’t get me started. They’re pretty much all as bad as each other. The entire system is fucked.

Of course those with a stake in the system will explain how this justifies public funding of political parties. I think this sleaze actually proves just how illegitimate the ‘big’ parties have become. If people are not interested in becoming members or donating to political parties, what’s the point of their very existence?

Do political parties merely exist to perpetuate the vapid and pointless status quo?

If there is any future in party politics it must be that it is nourished by the masses. If parties are forced to source their funds from shady foreign ‘businessmen’, then they’re just demonstrating their irrelevance and proving how pointless this archaic system has become.

If politics isn’t energising the people then it isn’t democracy.

The only sphere of politics that’s on the up is that of single-issue groups and small agenda-driven parties. As the internet continues to connect the dispersed, single-issue parties will continue to gain relevance and activists.

To stifle these movements by artificially financing the lumbering political system, would be to stick two fingers up to the people who are fed-up with Westminster self-interest, not to mention pissing all over what is left of our flagging democracy.

All three parties must clean up their act and re-engage with their base. If they fail to raise the necessary revenues from legitimate donations, then they should be allowed - nay forced - to die.

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday Links

From my review at LC ::

Political Betting - Keith Mothersson, guesting at PB, shares his worries about Republican electoral corruption, and how an Obama win may be denied.

Obsolete - What is it about 80-ft yachts that so irritates the average mortgage-slave? Answers on a postcard. Also: just how far up Murdoch’s arse is Slippery Dave prepared to go? Again, answers…

Amused Cynicism - While refuting aspects of a fellow blogger’s review of V for Vendetta, ‘cabalamat’ widens the debate on partisan blame for the erosion of civil liberties. Money-quote: “If you think the Tories would be significantly better on civil liberties, I think you are deluding yourself.” Amen.

Paul Linford - It’s Saturday, so it’s time for Paul’s must-read Journal column. This week’s subject, unsurprisingly, is baby-faced muppet George Osborne, who this week got pwned by Mandy.

Talking Points Memo - The McCain campaign sort to stoke ‘race attack’ reports before the facts were known. The woman who claimed that a black Obama supporter beat her and carved a “B” into her face, has admitted that she made the story up. (pssst! Maybe that the “B” appeared to be back-to-front was the clue?)

The Curvature - Prostitutes can’t be raped, apparently. Society sucks.

Earthpal - Common sense on sex education. Hyperbolic morons such as Sayeeda Warsi, would do well to give it a read.

Sphere: Related Content

Lieberman on Palin

Not exactly glowing, huh?

More…

McCain continues to falter as prominent Republicans cross the aisle to endorse Obama, and the blame game begins.

Sphere: Related Content

Hitched

I know, everyone hates those “I wont be blogging for a few days” posts.

Well this is one of those.

I’m getting married tomorrow, so I’ll be offline for a few days as we have the ceremony and go away to Dublin for a few days. We’re having the ceremony at a large country house in Lincolnshire that has significant history for us - I first told Olga I loved her in the house’s grounds several years ago.

Yeah, I’m a soppy git.

It’s going to be a very small wedding. 15-guests plus children. Champagne in the gardens and then off to a gastro-pub for dinner. Then Olga and myself fly to Dublin.

We’re planning a longer honeymoon in Sankt-Peterburg early next year.

So, this blog will be quiet for the next few days. Sunny is primed to keep an eye on Liberal Conspiracy from the States, and I should be back and on the ball on Friday.

I did think about micro-blogging the ceremony, but then I do value my life. ;o)

Toodle-pip

Sphere: Related Content

Tories: defer VAT for 6-months

Pah!

Talk about cheap populism?

I suppose it does sound good on paper. A lot of businesses rely on short-term credit to achieve their payroll commitments - the modern economy is built on such casual lending. But ultimately businesses will have to begin repaying the missed VAT payments in 6-months. Do we really think this situation is going to be that much better when we’re deep in a global recession?

It would be better that the government impose that banks - many of which we’re about to buy into - continue to grease the wheels of the ‘real economy’. The tax-payer’s stake in the banking system should be worth something.

David Cameron has to try something. Brown’s stock is rising and the impossible now looks probable - that Brown could well launch a significant fightback.

What really pisses off Tories is that Labour propaganda, with regard to the economy, has worked. Brown enjoyed huge kudos during the financial boom - when credit was dirt-cheap, and to be fair he didn’t have to do a great deal. And yet now, when the economy is fucked, he’s still gaining points!

Tories can’t quite get over the fact he’s winning both ways. I’m not saying it’s fair, but I am saying it’s piss-funny.

Sphere: Related Content

The irregular quote of the day

Frank Rich, writing in The NYT ::

Incredibly, McCain has nakedly endorsed the Bush-Rove brand of governance in his own campaign by assembling his personal set of lobbyist cronies and Rove operatives to run it. They have not only entangled him in a welter of conflicts of interest, but they’ve furthered cynical political stunts like the elevation of Sarah Palin. At least Bush and Rove didn’t try to put an unqualified hack like, say, Alberto Gonzales half a heartbeat away from the presidency.

Sphere: Related Content

Powell 4 Obama?

Chris Cillizza explains on WashPo’s The Fix blog, how Colin Powell’s endorsement of his opponent may be the final nail in John McCain’s presidential hopes.

It is widely rumoured that the retired General will offer his backing to Senator Obama on NBC talk show Meet The Press today. Cillizza points out that Powell’s support will shore up Obama’s foreign policy credentials - the one area where McCain still gets traction.

UPDATE ::

The Beltway rumour mill was right, Colin Powell today announced his endorsement of the Democrat presidential nominee Barack Obama.

As a former Army General and Secretary of State in the Bush administration, Powell’s support will be seen as important in bolstering Obama’s foreign policy proposals, which include a “phased withdrawal” from Iraq.

Powell used the endorsement, made on NBC’s Meet the Press, to stress his long friendship with Obama’s rival, John McCain, but added that his vice-presidential hopeful Sarah Palin, isn’t ready to be President of the United States.

UPDATE 2 ::

I’ve just listened to the audio from the Meet the Press interview, and Powell stressed the GOP’s lurch to the right as an important factor in his decision. Powell’s ‘defection’ may prove to be decisive in cementing the support of centre-right Republicans - the much-discussed ‘Obamacans’ - who feel alienated by the appointment of Palin and McCain’s reliance on divisive political tactics.

Powell rejected the culture-war that McCain has embraced.

Commentators also mentioned the importance of Powell as a retired veteran, with regard to the ageing populations of Florida. Many former members of the military live in the crucial state of Florida and would be considered natural McCain voters.

Sphere: Related Content