<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: is brown right about pmqs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/</link>
	<description>occasionally acerbic, cultural and political comment</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: trafficOne</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-224125</link>
		<dc:creator>trafficOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-224125</guid>
		<description>is there any reason why PMQ can not evolve in to PMTQ - where the replies to the questions may be given by the members of the front bench and not just the PM.  makes sense if politics is to become less confrontational and more collegiate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there any reason why PMQ can not evolve in to PMTQ - where the replies to the questions may be given by the members of the front bench and not just the PM.  makes sense if politics is to become less confrontational and more collegiate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grendel</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-223347</link>
		<dc:creator>Grendel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-223347</guid>
		<description>Of course PMQâ€™s is all about theatre and is really only of interest to members of â€˜the villageâ€™ and politico anoraks.

But if the media had reported that Brown had convincingly won the exchanges Iâ€™m sure his comments would have been different.

Just the first round of many to be sure but a bit of a sore loser methinks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course PMQâ€™s is all about theatre and is really only of interest to members of â€˜the villageâ€™ and politico anoraks.</p>
<p>But if the media had reported that Brown had convincingly won the exchanges Iâ€™m sure his comments would have been different.</p>
<p>Just the first round of many to be sure but a bit of a sore loser methinks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trafficOne</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-223088</link>
		<dc:creator>trafficOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-223088</guid>
		<description>pmq is about theatre.  is theatre really that important to the wellbeing of the individual?

with regards to the point about how it affect the (party) troops I agree.  Having said it is possible to close/modify one form of nourishment and produce/develop another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pmq is about theatre.  is theatre really that important to the wellbeing of the individual?</p>
<p>with regards to the point about how it affect the (party) troops I agree.  Having said it is possible to close/modify one form of nourishment and produce/develop another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyger</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-223002</link>
		<dc:creator>tyger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-223002</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyger</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-223000</link>
		<dc:creator>tyger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-223000</guid>
		<description>Man in shed,

Thanks for dropping by and leaving such a well-informed comment. However, I would counter some of what you say.

Over the past couple of years Brown has, on occasion, looked a complete pillock. The highlighted patriotism drive would be a prime example, but I can't help but think these are occasions when the dour Scot has listened to his 'advisors.'

Brown is a serious guy, who is in politics because he believes in making things better. You may hate his statist approach and his politics in general (some of which I loathe), but the constant sniping from many in the Tory ranks does not ring true. 

On QT last week, Michael Howard attempted to resurrect the spin label for Brown's Labour. Brown doesn't go in for spin - he never has (the media-driven body-politic seems to baffle him). Modern politics means, by definition, that the news has to handled, but do the Tories really believe that Brown is more of a media-animal than Cameron? Do me a favour.

Brown has his faults. But much of the criticism, including my own, has been formed through the prism of the TBGB spat, the subsequent rampant skulduggery, and Brown's penchant for sulkiness. Brown doesn't have this excuse now, but he also doesn't have these worries either.

Judge Brown on how the next 12-months play out. Because, and regular readers will vouch for me here, if he screws up, the criticism will be louder and more vitriolic from this blog than any Tory one, I assure you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man in shed,</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by and leaving such a well-informed comment. However, I would counter some of what you say.</p>
<p>Over the past couple of years Brown has, on occasion, looked a complete pillock. The highlighted patriotism drive would be a prime example, but I can&#8217;t help but think these are occasions when the dour Scot has listened to his &#8216;advisors.&#8217;</p>
<p>Brown is a serious guy, who is in politics because he believes in making things better. You may hate his statist approach and his politics in general (some of which I loathe), but the constant sniping from many in the Tory ranks does not ring true. </p>
<p>On QT last week, Michael Howard attempted to resurrect the spin label for Brown&#8217;s Labour. Brown doesn&#8217;t go in for spin - he never has (the media-driven body-politic seems to baffle him). Modern politics means, by definition, that the news has to handled, but do the Tories really believe that Brown is more of a media-animal than Cameron? Do me a favour.</p>
<p>Brown has his faults. But much of the criticism, including my own, has been formed through the prism of the TBGB spat, the subsequent rampant skulduggery, and Brown&#8217;s penchant for sulkiness. Brown doesn&#8217;t have this excuse now, but he also doesn&#8217;t have these worries either.</p>
<p>Judge Brown on how the next 12-months play out. Because, and regular readers will vouch for me here, if he screws up, the criticism will be louder and more vitriolic from this blog than any Tory one, I assure you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hill</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-222786</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-222786</guid>
		<description>PMQs matter to the troops but not to the electorate. The main lesson of Brown's first foray was how much is going to stay the same post-Tone.

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/dave_hill/2007/07/clunking_fist_steady_as_he_goes.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PMQs matter to the troops but not to the electorate. The main lesson of Brown&#8217;s first foray was how much is going to stay the same post-Tone.</p>
<p><a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/dave_hill/2007/07/clunking_fist_steady_as_he_goes.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/commentisfree.guardian.co.uk');">http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/dave_hill/2007/07/clunking_fist_steady_as_he_goes.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man in a Shed</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-222621</link>
		<dc:creator>Man in a Shed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-222621</guid>
		<description>The thing about PMQs is you get to see the PM standing alone - with no back up. His or her party can sense the mood in the air. When the PM is on form the government party is happy and well lead. When the PM can't even remember how many days he's been in office then people will start to wonder.

After all PMQs were the first sign that Ming is heading towards the rocks.

Brown's attempts at spin to answer this add up just as badly as his estimate of how many days he'd been in office. He says its all about change - but then paralyses the NHS with a massive review ( &lt;i&gt;code as we all know for waiting for the answer the review has already been given - chose the head of the review and you chose the answer&lt;/i&gt;.)

He spins against theatre - but then puts up a Union flag over No10 and makes a whole load of cringe worthy pseudo patriotic statements that would be a whole lot more convincing if they weren't made by a man who helped break up the UK and continues to under fund English peoples NHS, education etc compared to his own constituents who are being looked after quite nicely by the SNP right now.

PMQs aren't definitive - but the crack in the armour is there and its very public. The way Brown failed also suggest deeper underlying character flaws. Brown will have to learn very quickly. I suspect that Labour party politics has prepared him poorly for open debate with people who aren't afraid of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about PMQs is you get to see the PM standing alone - with no back up. His or her party can sense the mood in the air. When the PM is on form the government party is happy and well lead. When the PM can&#8217;t even remember how many days he&#8217;s been in office then people will start to wonder.</p>
<p>After all PMQs were the first sign that Ming is heading towards the rocks.</p>
<p>Brown&#8217;s attempts at spin to answer this add up just as badly as his estimate of how many days he&#8217;d been in office. He says its all about change - but then paralyses the NHS with a massive review ( <i>code as we all know for waiting for the answer the review has already been given - chose the head of the review and you chose the answer</i>.)</p>
<p>He spins against theatre - but then puts up a Union flag over No10 and makes a whole load of cringe worthy pseudo patriotic statements that would be a whole lot more convincing if they weren&#8217;t made by a man who helped break up the UK and continues to under fund English peoples NHS, education etc compared to his own constituents who are being looked after quite nicely by the SNP right now.</p>
<p>PMQs aren&#8217;t definitive - but the crack in the armour is there and its very public. The way Brown failed also suggest deeper underlying character flaws. Brown will have to learn very quickly. I suspect that Labour party politics has prepared him poorly for open debate with people who aren&#8217;t afraid of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jams o donnell</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-222476</link>
		<dc:creator>jams o donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-222476</guid>
		<description>Very true Tyger. The electorate don't care much about PMQs and why should they when all it seems to be is about petty point scoring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true Tyger. The electorate don&#8217;t care much about PMQs and why should they when all it seems to be is about petty point scoring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alun</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-222142</link>
		<dc:creator>Alun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/2007/07/05/is-brown-right-about-pmqs/#comment-222142</guid>
		<description>It's always worth remembering that Hague often got the better of Blair in PMQ's... only to get crushed like an insect in the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always worth remembering that Hague often got the better of Blair in PMQ&#8217;s&#8230; only to get crushed like an insect in the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
