Posted by tyger on Thursday, April 5, 2007, at 11:50 am, and filed under economics, media, meta, tech, usa.Follow any responses to this post with its comments RSS feed.Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
What worries me is not the question asked in the post, what really worries me is that they speaking in the legislative chambers of “protecting” the internet. That there exist conspiracies or not is the same as that there exist Muslim or Christian comics, or personal insults or anything that you may like or not. It is all a question of respect, of education.
I’m afraid “protecting” the internet to save the great majority against a minority will not eventually be fair.
Those who are really respectful will by themselves ban those who are not. Instituting laws is not the answer, in my opinion, education is the answer.
And I can see people are much better than they were years ago. And those who are not will be always subjected to our banning, which is more effective than any law because it will be the law enacted by the majority of us.
{ 1 } Comments
What worries me is not the question asked in the post, what really worries me is that they speaking in the legislative chambers of “protecting” the internet. That there exist conspiracies or not is the same as that there exist Muslim or Christian comics, or personal insults or anything that you may like or not. It is all a question of respect, of education.
I’m afraid “protecting” the internet to save the great majority against a minority will not eventually be fair.
Those who are really respectful will by themselves ban those who are not. Instituting laws is not the answer, in my opinion, education is the answer.
And I can see people are much better than they were years ago. And those who are not will be always subjected to our banning, which is more effective than any law because it will be the law enacted by the majority of us.