
Mikhail Khodorkovsky, resides in a Siberian prison having been jailed for tax evasion and fraud. Khodorkovsky was the owner of the huge oil conglomerate Yukos, and was a political rival of Vladimir Putin. In this week’s edition of The Economist (subs req), Khodorkovsky has warned of the emerging world order and the “Sinification” of the vast expanse of South East Russia (Federal Siberia).
China will at last clearly stake its claim to the role and status of a global superpower, the military and economic protector of the eastern hemisphere. The signs of China’s transformation will include its response to new missile launches by North Korea—already China is giving clear signals that the key to a resolution of the North Korean nuclear issue lies in Beijing, and no place else. The rest of the world will have to accept China’s terms for settling the matter and thereby recognise China as not just a regional superpower, but a global one too.
The new world order will mean not only a global status for China, but also the formation of a new non-aligned movement, with Delhi, Tehran and a number of Latin American capitals as its emerging centres. This movement will be amorphous and disjointed, but the mere fact of its existence will ensure that the world can neither remain unipolar nor become bipolar on the Yalta model. A potential American attack on Iran will accelerate the formation of this new world order, because it will force China to declare its strategic ambitions sooner, as well as catalysing the formation of yet more new centres of active anti-American sentiment worldwide.
[...]
Russia finds itself in a particularly difficult situation. It has essentially abandoned the industrial economy, but has not achieved a post-industrial one. It has abandoned many of the things that have made it unique historically, but has not sufficiently fitted into the America-centred world either. It is feeling remarkably strong pressure from China, which is interested in the sparsely populated vastness of Siberia, so rich in natural resources. A rapid Sinification of the Asian part of Russia is already taking place, and represents the main strategic threat to the country’s security. Even today, the logistical interaction and human contact between the areas to the east of Lake Baikal and the countries of Asia, especially China, are comparable with or even exceed such ties with Moscow, while Sinification is seen as something inevitable.
I agree with some of what Khodorkovsky writes, but I don’t agree that the Latin American countries, Iran, and India will drastically redefine the geopolitical reality. India will become an economic powerhouse, and may provide a bulwark against Chinese ambition - this explains the recent warming of American/Indian relations, but America still has the cultural and political climate for creativity, and the business acumen needed to maximise productivity.
China also has to deal with its chronic democratic deficit. If China’s middle-classes continue to grow, as undoubtedly they will, then their demands for political representation will only get louder. Many communist modernisers do not expect the current model to survive beyond Hu Jinto’s tenure. There will be a great deal of internal political change within China before it makes the rest of the world shudder.
Regular readers of this blog will know that I have travelled to Siberia and know the region and people well. They are aware of the millions of Chinese just beyond their southern boarder. They have lived through the Sino-Russian stand-off of 1960-70, and know the deep mistrust that still exists. When I was in Novosibirsk earlier this year, an uncle asked about the current situation in China, and he seemed resigned to Chinese expansionism.
China does indeed greedily eye the vast spaces and ample resources of Siberia, and no doubt, some of the more ambitious hawks in Beijing believe its capture inevitable. However, the reality of Russia’s still vast nuclear deterrent will surely dissuade any direct Chinese aggression.
Sphere: Related Content
What I really find amazing is not the infinite variety of courses the world could take in near future (we should start collecting bets at this point, or it will all go to waste), but the fact that a former Komsomol secretary/computer importer/oil baron, currently imprisoned for tax fraud and fishy privatization, seems to have the credibility and required knowledge to play the Siberian Oracle, and in The Economist of all papers. Is it possible that all it takes to make the whole world listen to your visions of new world order is to get very rich, break a few laws and end up in prison (as long as you do it in Russia, of course, not in Texas; if you do it in Texas, you go to prison for 20 years and you don’t get to publish smartass articles in high-profile papers). I find Mr. Khodorkovsky extremely fascinating, not because of his financial ambitions that put him in prison to begin with, but because of his hunger for global fame as a credible and respectable political analyst whose opinion counts. Anyone seen Spielberg’s Catch Me If You Can?
Wouldn’t a gigantic source of investment capital be made available to the Chinese government if it decided to sell its land assets back to the Chinese people. There would not be any point unless there was a worthwhile target for that capital? Siberia? A tie in with Russian resources and technical know how, Japanese, Indian and Chinese labour and markets and know how, could result in an Asian Economic Union that would dwarf the European one. Whats that old saying,’Who ever controls the world’s island controls the world’.