Monthly Archive for November, 2006

History Rewritten

OliNorth

Timothy Noah, over on Slate, wants to know why, in an era where the media is infatuated with anniversaries, there was no coverage of the 20th Anniversary of the Iran - Contra scandal in the weekends papers?

Noah gives a couple of reasons, but if you ask me, the one reason is that America wants to see its presidents as chosen, almost hallowed people. Reagan was, wilfully or not, heavily involved in the complicated Iran-Contra affair.

For the uninitiated, a stupendously simplified description of the Iran-Contra scandal goes like this: arms were illegally sold to America’s chief enemy in the Middle East, Iran, and the profits were illegally channelled to contra groups (radical anti-Marxists) in Nicaragua (in line with the Monroe doctrine of US intervention on continental America).

The American rightwing, led by the romantics at the Weekly Standard and the National Review, have completely rewritten the history of Reagan’s presidency. Reagan is held up as a bastion of all that conservatism stands for, and he is almost exclusively credited with ‘defeating’ the Soviet Union - no mention of Gorbachev or the Duma’s corrupt asset raiders in that history.

So, just two decades on from the scandal that almost saw a President impeached, the American right have scrubbed clean the nation’s collective memory (chief protagonist, Oliver North, is painted as an all-American hero on Fox News). I wonder, if given a similar time frame, they can reinvent the career of this President?

Sphere: Related Content

Wii are idiots

wiimote

It seems some gamers are unable to keep hold of the new fangle dangle Wii controllers.

Prezzer bombs at PMQ

Prescott

Just listened to Prezzer’s performance on PMQs, yesterday (podcast), and the reports are right, he was atrocious.

Time to jettison methinks…

Sphere: Related Content

Why Europe fades

Oxford University is currently debating its internal governance. 800-years of being run by an academic cooperative is under threat as modernisers seek to bring in external expertise. Timothy Garton Ash, one such moderniser, uses his Guardian Op-Ed column to push the case for reform. He makes an interesting point about European educational aspirations:

Britain, like France and Germany, spends only 1.1% of its gross domestic product on tertiary education. The US spends 2.6% - 1.4% from private sources and 1.2% from public. In other words, American public expenditure on higher education is more than our public and private expenditure combined. Europe talks the talk of a “knowledge-based economy”; the US walks the walk. And it is being followed aggressively by the upthrusting Asian economies.

What is to be done? One option would be for European taxpayers to pay significantly more for their leading national universities. That is about as likely as the Colosseum moving to Nottingham.

I know just the spot…

Sphere: Related Content

Holiday

Pif Paf

Next Thursday I fly to Tallinn, Estonia, for 10-days. Naturally I’ll be blogging each day from this tech-savvy Baltic capital.

Sphere: Related Content

‘David Cameron is just a blue-rinsed Tony Blair’

DC
Even he doesn’t know.

A group of talking heads address the question on everybody’s lips, “what exactly is David Cameron for?”

Sphere: Related Content

Murdoch’s hack in the dock

Is it wrong to feel some Schadenfreude at the predicament of journalist Clive Goodman? Goodman works for The News of the World, which isn’t a good start, but things get worse; today Mr. Goodman has pleaded guilty to a conspiracy to intercept private telephone messages (stored by mobile phone operators on behalf on their customers).

Mr. Goodman, with fellow conspirator Glenn Mulcaire (a former footballer with Wimbledon AFC), accessed the private messages of various public persons, including aids to Prince William, model Elle Macpherson, and the politician Simon Hughes. Mr. Goodman then reported these stories in his loathsome rag.

What really gets my goat is the utter hypocrisy of tabloid journalism. Yeah, yeah, I know – join the human race – everyone hates tabloids; but please, I pay for this bandwidth, so hear me out. Tabloids fill their pages with little more than idle un-newsworthy gossip and moral grandstanding, and yet they themselves are guilty of the most heinous immorality.

They bitch about celebrity addictions, yet cocaine and excessive alcohol flows freely in the media world. They bitch about the government prying into our lives, and yet the entrapment and surveillance of celebrities is common-practice among the Red Tops. They have created a whole industry built on building up and knocking down public figures. It’s a self-nourishing circle of broken lives and ruined careers. What’s the point? How do these ‘newspapers’ contribute positively to our country?

So I hope you’ll forgive me for delighting in watching one of Murdoch’s winged monkeys standing in the dock. Its petty and vindictive I know, but I hope they throw the book at him - preferably a large, heavy one.

Sphere: Related Content

Dave Hill Watch

Adoption

Dave Hill is a novelist, journalist, and now blogger. His site is the place to go for the discerning reader; it’s brilliantly written and wonderfully eclectic. Go see. Anyway, Dave has a new novel out, The Adoption, and I went into Newark on Saturday to try my luck at buying a copy (I avoid, where possible, buying books online). No luck. WHSmiths didn’t have it, and Buy the Book, our local coffee-shop/booksellers, didn’t have a copy either. Bad form you two, bad form.

Now of course it may be that Dave’s tome has not yet been unpacked (or maybe it’s not been sent to these two stores), after all, it has only recently been published and will not be ‘officially launched’ until Monday, but that hasn’t stopped Amazon or Tesco from shipping it (since 24th November), so what are you waiting for? I’ll be popping into town next week to check…

Anyway, this got me thinking: just how powerful can the blogosphere be? Could a blogger campaign actually get more of Mr. Hill’s books in our stores? Aren’t you just a bit pissed off that your local bookseller sells the same old chaff by the same old writers? Wouldn’t you like them to take a gamble on someone different, someone fresh, someone like, oh I don’t know, say… Dave Hill? Take a look in your local booksellers and see if one Mr. Hill’s books are in stock. If it is, email me, and the bookshop will get some praise here for its impeccable taste. If not, then the store gets a very stern dressing down.

I have posted pics of the Dave Hill-less shelves, taken with my cell-phone, on the tygerland photoblog - keep an eye out for more. Oh, and feel free to contribute and email in your pics. If the plan works, then we’ll get other books written by bloggers into stores and literary democracy will be ours.

Newark County Library has two copies on order. Good form, good form indeed.

Sphere: Related Content

Another Guardian columnist attacks Borat

borat

Please get over yourself Marcel Berlins.

Pointless packaging

Don’t you just hate it?

10 things I would never do

Doing the rounds is the 10 things I would never do Meme. I have been tagged…

…in no particular order:

  • I would never pay for sex at the point of use

  • I would never again eat belly pork - cheap, fatty, and horrible

  • I would never drive away from the scene of an accident

  • I would never trust anyone who works on a fairground

  • I would never wear blue on election day (unless I was Stateside)

  • I would never watch any of the Final Destination films again (too scared)

  • I would never buy another Windows based computer

  • I would never pay to read a blog (although happy to donate retrospectively, as is my want)

  • I would never cheer a Newcastle United goal

  • I would never tuck my trousers into my socks

    Thanks to YellowDuck for the tag. I tag: Mr Zhisou, Jose, Richard, Dr. Picaros, jams, Jag, JohnInnit and CafeGirl.

    Update: Buy this book - by order of da management

    Sphere: Related Content

  • Imitation Is The Highest Form Of Flattery

    Cameron Jive

    Labour’s ‘acute’ cash-flow problem

    TBGB-Shadow
    Will Brown be able to emerge from Blair’s shadow?

    Many among the electorate believe that if Gordon Brown succeeds Tony Blair next summer, then he should call a snap election, and ask for a mandate from the British people. However, as everyone knows, and Labour have now admitted, the Party simply doesn’t have the cash to fight another election. In fact it was the immense financial strain of the last election, that got the party onto the financial mess it’s in now - investigations et al.

    In a understatement, the Labour party has admitted that it is struggling to service its loans, and is experiencing a “difficult financial year”.

    It would be easy to allow Labour’s financial problems to convince us that now is the time for public funds to be given to political parties, but this would be a democratic aberration, which would excuse parties for their part in the creating our culture of political apathy. If political parties are unable to motivate sympathisers to donate, then either they change, or they die. It’s called Darwinism. Look it up.

    The main three parties have all migrated to the centre. This is as a result of increasing flatness in the class structure (a large Middle Class), and the reality that the First Past the Post electoral system results in indistinguishable political factions vying for the same voting block. Why would you give money to Labour, other than for a peerage, when it stands for nothing unique? And if the parties are fighting for the same centre ground, canabalising each other’s policies, what is the point of the party system?

    If we are serious about motivating participatory democracy, we must embrace Proportional Representation. This would enable marginal groups, who are able to attract interest and members, to break the stagnant hold the big three parties have on the British body politic. This blog genuinely believes that this would increase voter turnout and offer real choice. As coalitions are built, small parties would become relevant and their slight number of parliamentarians would actually have value. Voting for the Greens or UKIP would no longer be a wasted ballot. Maybe this would encourage the big parties to rediscover their ideological direction, and, subsequently, their support.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Chirac lecturers Europe on letting down Nato

    Peter Doherty

    Does anyone else think this is a bit like Pete Doherty lecturing you about your caffeine addiction?

    Sphere: Related Content

    Tories: Education divide opening up

    Really? I always thought the Tories supported apartheid?

    I wonder, did Gideon get the memo?