<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clare Short resigns the whip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/</link>
	<description>occasionally acerbic, cultural and political comment</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard W. Symonds</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6610</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Symonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6610</guid>
		<description>I think what has wound me up about this 'Clare Short' issue is 'the political chatter in the talking shop' trap, which has crept into your site.

All this talk about who will be the next Deputy Leader etc. Names which might mean something to NuLabor idealogical fanatics, but mean nothing to us, the voters.

To me, these "Nu" names are just the same old bunch who supports/supported Blair; Henry Jacksonites, Eustonites etc. They are a waste of space.

The Labour Party needs to re-discover its roots - not pull them out.

Only the likes of Clare Short/Glenda Jackson/Tony Benn etc can bring the Labour Party back from the brink...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what has wound me up about this &#8216;Clare Short&#8217; issue is &#8216;the political chatter in the talking shop&#8217; trap, which has crept into your site.</p>
<p>All this talk about who will be the next Deputy Leader etc. Names which might mean something to NuLabor idealogical fanatics, but mean nothing to us, the voters.</p>
<p>To me, these &#8220;Nu&#8221; names are just the same old bunch who supports/supported Blair; Henry Jacksonites, Eustonites etc. They are a waste of space.</p>
<p>The Labour Party needs to re-discover its roots - not pull them out.</p>
<p>Only the likes of Clare Short/Glenda Jackson/Tony Benn etc can bring the Labour Party back from the brink&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W. Symonds</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6606</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Symonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6606</guid>
		<description>There's nothing like resurrecting a dead sheep on a wet Sunday night...and its fighting back !

Good on you, Tyger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing like resurrecting a dead sheep on a wet Sunday night&#8230;and its fighting back !</p>
<p>Good on you, Tyger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyger</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6604</link>
		<dc:creator>tyger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6604</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;â€œbeing savaged by a dead sheepâ€&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://tygerland.net/2006/03/29/your-government-is-laughing-at-you/
http://tygerland.net/2006/03/22/on-the-cash-for-peerages-scandal/
http://tygerland.net/2006/03/10/browns-wealth-redistribution/
http://tygerland.net/2006/04/27/blair-on-the-ropes/
http://tygerland.net/2006/04/25/more-local-election-musings/
http://tygerland.net/2006/04/19/central-funding-is-undemocratic/
http://tygerland.net/2006/04/19/blair-and-may-5th/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>â€œbeing savaged by a dead sheepâ€</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://tygerland.net/2006/03/29/your-government-is-laughing-at-you/" rel="nofollow" >http://tygerland.net/2006/03/29/your-government-is-laughing-at-you/</a><br />
<a href="http://tygerland.net/2006/03/22/on-the-cash-for-peerages-scandal/" rel="nofollow" >http://tygerland.net/2006/03/22/on-the-cash-for-peerages-scandal/</a><br />
<a href="http://tygerland.net/2006/03/10/browns-wealth-redistribution/" rel="nofollow" >http://tygerland.net/2006/03/10/browns-wealth-redistribution/</a><br />
<a href="http://tygerland.net/2006/04/27/blair-on-the-ropes/" rel="nofollow" >http://tygerland.net/2006/04/27/blair-on-the-ropes/</a><br />
<a href="http://tygerland.net/2006/04/25/more-local-election-musings/" rel="nofollow" >http://tygerland.net/2006/04/25/more-local-election-musings/</a><br />
<a href="http://tygerland.net/2006/04/19/central-funding-is-undemocratic/" rel="nofollow" >http://tygerland.net/2006/04/19/central-funding-is-undemocratic/</a><br />
<a href="http://tygerland.net/2006/04/19/blair-and-may-5th/" rel="nofollow" >http://tygerland.net/2006/04/19/blair-and-may-5th/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W. Symonds</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6602</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Symonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6602</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Tyger, like "being savaged by a dead sheep"...sorry, too unfair, but I feel quite strongly about this one.

I no longer trust the judgement of any Labour politician who did not openly and courageously speak out against an immoral, illegal invasion and occupation of a sovereign state. Most Labour politicians openly supported the lies and deceit by silence - which is consent. A few did not - once they fully realised they were being conned and lied to.

For me, New Labour is now "NuLabor" - in bed with the "Neo-Cons" - which has turned into a monstrous "Nucon Tribe". I would trust a snake more.

The only people who I might consider voting for next May are those who declared their opposition to the US-led war - which had nothing to do with democracy (the US is a plutocracy), and everything to do with oil.

Who are these 'electable' people ? Not Robin Cook (he's dead). Not Wedgie Benn (no longer MP). Not Clare Short (unless she joins - as did Orwell - the ILP (Independent Labour Party). Who else ? Glenda Jackson ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Tyger, like &#8220;being savaged by a dead sheep&#8221;&#8230;sorry, too unfair, but I feel quite strongly about this one.</p>
<p>I no longer trust the judgement of any Labour politician who did not openly and courageously speak out against an immoral, illegal invasion and occupation of a sovereign state. Most Labour politicians openly supported the lies and deceit by silence - which is consent. A few did not - once they fully realised they were being conned and lied to.</p>
<p>For me, New Labour is now &#8220;NuLabor&#8221; - in bed with the &#8220;Neo-Cons&#8221; - which has turned into a monstrous &#8220;Nucon Tribe&#8221;. I would trust a snake more.</p>
<p>The only people who I might consider voting for next May are those who declared their opposition to the US-led war - which had nothing to do with democracy (the US is a plutocracy), and everything to do with oil.</p>
<p>Who are these &#8216;electable&#8217; people ? Not Robin Cook (he&#8217;s dead). Not Wedgie Benn (no longer MP). Not Clare Short (unless she joins - as did Orwell - the ILP (Independent Labour Party). Who else ? Glenda Jackson ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyger</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6583</link>
		<dc:creator>tyger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6583</guid>
		<description>I donâ€™t think Iâ€™m being particularly loyal.  Iâ€™m not a party apparatchik, I think I am one of the most critical Labour-leaning blogs on the scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I donâ€™t think Iâ€™m being particularly loyal.  Iâ€™m not a party apparatchik, I think I am one of the most critical Labour-leaning blogs on the scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W. Symonds</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6580</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Symonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6580</guid>
		<description>Your loyalties are touching...but are they dangerously misplaced ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your loyalties are touching&#8230;but are they dangerously misplaced ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyger</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6514</link>
		<dc:creator>tyger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6514</guid>
		<description>Thanks Snowflake, I agree. 

And Richard, I left the party over Iraq, and as much as I admire 'Blair the politician', I will not return to the party untill he is gone.  However I have never turned on he party at large, unlike Clare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Snowflake, I agree. </p>
<p>And Richard, I left the party over Iraq, and as much as I admire &#8216;Blair the politician&#8217;, I will not return to the party untill he is gone.  However I have never turned on he party at large, unlike Clare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowflake5</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6511</link>
		<dc:creator>snowflake5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6511</guid>
		<description>I was against the war from day one too, but I've no time for Clare Short. The reason she didn't resign before the war was because she loved her job as internatinal development secretary too much and didn't want to make the sacrifice. And the reason she's so angry now is that when she did make the sacrifice, she didn't get credit for it, as too late, so she's ended up with nothing.

Whereas both John Denham and Robin Cook handled it with much more grace and did it before the war (and they sacrificed bigger careers).

Her timing is off again - if she objects to "presidential politics" why wait till Blair has announced he is leaving to make her stand? Again, what's the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was against the war from day one too, but I&#8217;ve no time for Clare Short. The reason she didn&#8217;t resign before the war was because she loved her job as internatinal development secretary too much and didn&#8217;t want to make the sacrifice. And the reason she&#8217;s so angry now is that when she did make the sacrifice, she didn&#8217;t get credit for it, as too late, so she&#8217;s ended up with nothing.</p>
<p>Whereas both John Denham and Robin Cook handled it with much more grace and did it before the war (and they sacrificed bigger careers).</p>
<p>Her timing is off again - if she objects to &#8220;presidential politics&#8221; why wait till Blair has announced he is leaving to make her stand? Again, what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6479</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 07:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6479</guid>
		<description>She made a patent error by "believing" Blair. A minister cannot be gullible because a minister must be conversant with everything she/he is discussing in the cabinet meetings. It is easy not to study and be taken by the hand, but easy things are for mediocrities.

Blinding herself to anything but Blair was her main mistake, and as I said mistakes in politics are paid for.

That spot in her career will not be forgotten by the media, I can assure you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She made a patent error by &#8220;believing&#8221; Blair. A minister cannot be gullible because a minister must be conversant with everything she/he is discussing in the cabinet meetings. It is easy not to study and be taken by the hand, but easy things are for mediocrities.</p>
<p>Blinding herself to anything but Blair was her main mistake, and as I said mistakes in politics are paid for.</p>
<p>That spot in her career will not be forgotten by the media, I can assure you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W. Symonds</title>
		<link>http://tygerland.net/2006/10/21/clare-short-resigns-the-whip/#comment-6454</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Symonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tygerland.net/?p=1196#comment-6454</guid>
		<description>Clare Short "voted to send the troops into war", because she believed her Prime Minister, at the time, that there was a credible threat from Iraq - for example, do you remember that "45 minutes" hogwash ?

Then she had the guts to resign - and the courage to speak out - something which gutless and cowardly party apologists still fail to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clare Short &#8220;voted to send the troops into war&#8221;, because she believed her Prime Minister, at the time, that there was a credible threat from Iraq - for example, do you remember that &#8220;45 minutes&#8221; hogwash ?</p>
<p>Then she had the guts to resign - and the courage to speak out - something which gutless and cowardly party apologists still fail to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
